ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

灵敏度分析-集成响应面方法×中心复合设计×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990s–2000s (integration practice)1951
提出者Box & Wilson (RSM, 1951); Saltelli et al. (global SA framework, 1990s–2000s)George E. P. Box and K. B. Wilson
类型Hybrid experimental-analytical methodResponse surface experimental design
开创性文献Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2016). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (4th ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-1118916018Box, G. E. P., & Wilson, K. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 13(1), 1–45. DOI ↗
别名SA-RSM, RSM with sensitivity analysis, sensitivity-augmented RSM, response surface methodology with factor screeningCCD, Box-Wilson design, central composite response surface design, rotatable central composite design
相关53
摘要Sensitivity analysis-integrated RSM couples a structured experimental design with a formal sensitivity analysis of the fitted response surface model. After estimating a polynomial surrogate from designed experiments, global or local sensitivity indices are computed to quantify each input factor's relative contribution to output variability. This allows practitioners to identify which factors truly drive the response before committing to full optimization, reducing cost and improving the reliability of the final optimum.Central Composite Design (CCD) is a second-order response surface design that allows researchers to efficiently fit a full quadratic model relating multiple continuous input factors to one or more response variables. Introduced by Box and Wilson in 1951, it combines a factorial (or fractional factorial) core, axial (star) points, and center-point replicates into a single unified design, making it the most widely used design for process optimization in engineering, chemistry, and manufacturing.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Sensitivity analysis-integrated response surface methodology · Central Composite Design. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare