ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于敏感性分析的意向性抽样×典型案例抽样×
领域调查方法论调查方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990s–2000s1980s (systematized in Patton 1990/2002)
提出者Rooted in Patton's purposive sampling typology; sensitivity analysis practices formalized in research synthesis literatureMichael Quinn Patton
类型Purposive qualitative sampling with robustness verificationPurposive qualitative sampling strategy
开创性文献Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972123Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711
别名purposive sampling with sensitivity checks, robust purposive sampling, sensitivity-tested purposive selectiontypical case selection, modal case sampling, representative case sampling, average case sampling
相关55
摘要Sensitivity analysis-based purposive sampling extends conventional purposive sampling by systematically testing whether key findings or case-selection decisions change when the inclusion criteria, selection logic, or boundary conditions are altered. It applies the logic of sensitivity analysis — standard in quantitative research and systematic reviews — to qualitative case selection, giving researchers explicit evidence of how robust their purposive choices are to plausible alternative selection rules.Typical case sampling is a purposive strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that represent what is ordinary, normal, or most common within a target group. Rather than seeking outliers or the widest possible variation, the goal is to illustrate and communicate what a typical experience, program, or phenomenon looks like to stakeholders or audiences unfamiliar with it. The strategy is widely used in qualitative evaluation research and program reporting.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Sensitivity Analysis-Based Purposive Sampling · Typical Case Sampling. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare