方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于敏感性分析的意向性抽样× | 离异案例抽样× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 调查方法论 | 调查方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1990 |
| 提出者≠ | Rooted in Patton's purposive sampling typology; sensitivity analysis practices formalized in research synthesis literature | Michael Quinn Patton |
| 类型≠ | Purposive qualitative sampling with robustness verification | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy |
| 开创性文献≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972123 | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 |
| 别名≠ | purposive sampling with sensitivity checks, robust purposive sampling, sensitivity-tested purposive selection | extreme case sampling, outlier sampling, negative case sampling, deviant-case selection |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Sensitivity analysis-based purposive sampling extends conventional purposive sampling by systematically testing whether key findings or case-selection decisions change when the inclusion criteria, selection logic, or boundary conditions are altered. It applies the logic of sensitivity analysis — standard in quantitative research and systematic reviews — to qualitative case selection, giving researchers explicit evidence of how robust their purposive choices are to plausible alternative selection rules. | Deviant case sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher intentionally selects cases that are unusual, exceptional, or markedly different from the norm — outliers, extreme successes, or conspicuous failures. The goal is not statistical representation but deep learning from cases that illuminate the boundaries of a phenomenon, challenge prevailing assumptions, or reveal processes that typical cases obscure. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|