ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

西雅图心绞痛问卷 (SAQ)×明尼苏达心力衰竭生活质量问卷 (MLHFQ)×
领域心脏病学心脏病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19951987
提出者John A. SpertusTimothy S. Rector
类型Self-report questionnaireSelf-report questionnaire
开创性文献Spertus, J. A., Winder, J. A., Dewhurst, T. A., Deyo, R. A., Prodzinski, J., McDonell, M., & Fihn, S. D. (1995). Development and evaluation of a health-related quality of life measure for men with erectile dysfunction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 25(2), 149–155. link ↗Rector, T. S., Kubo, S. H., & Cohn, J. N. (1987). Patients' self-assessment of their congestive heart failure. Part 2: Content, reliability and responsiveness of a new measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Heart Failure, 3(5), 198–209. link ↗
别名SAQMLHFQ
相关44
摘要The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) is a 19-item self-report measure that evaluates the frequency and severity of angina symptoms, functional limitations, and disease-specific quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Developed by Spertus and colleagues in 1995, the SAQ has become the gold-standard symptom-specific QoL instrument in cardiology and is recommended by major guidelines for assessing angina burden and treatment response.The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is a 21-item self-report measure that quantifies the multidimensional burden of heart failure on patients' daily living and quality of life. Developed by Rector, Kubo, and Cohn in 1987, the MLHFQ is the most widely used disease-specific QoL instrument in heart failure research and clinical practice, valued for its brevity, sensitivity to treatment response, and predictive value for prognosis.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Seattle Angina Questionnaire · Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare