ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

范围界定审查×文献计量分析×
领域科学计量学科学计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20051969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
提出者Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'MalleyAlan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
类型Evidence synthesis review designQuantitative literature analysis
开创性文献Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗
别名scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence mapbibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
相关66
摘要A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Scoping Review · Bibliometric Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare