ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

科学计量分析×系统性文献综述×
领域科学计量学科学计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1969 (term); 1963 (Price's foundational work)1993 (Cochrane Collaboration); 2004 (Kitchenham SLR guidelines)
提出者V. V. Nalimov and Z. M. Mulchenko (term coined); Derek J. de Solla Price (foundational methods)Archie Cochrane (conceptual foundation); formalized by the Cochrane Collaboration (1993) and Barbara Kitchenham in software engineering (2004)
类型Quantitative literature analysisEvidence synthesis methodology
开创性文献Nalimov, V. V., & Mulchenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometriya: Izucheniye razvitiya nauki kak informatsionnogo protsessa [Scientometrics: The Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process]. Nauka. link ↗Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401. link ↗
别名scientometrics, science of science, quantitative science studies, research evaluation analysisSLR, systematic review, evidence synthesis review, structured literature review
相关65
摘要Scientometric analysis applies statistical and computational methods to publication and citation data to measure the growth, structure, and impact of scientific fields. Drawing on databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, or OpenAlex, it quantifies output trends, identifies leading authors and institutions, maps intellectual networks, and evaluates research impact — transforming large bibliographic corpora into evidence-based portraits of how knowledge develops and spreads.A systematic literature review (SLR) is a structured, reproducible method for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a research question. Unlike a narrative review, it follows an explicit, pre-specified protocol — from database search strings through inclusion criteria to data extraction — so that the process is transparent, auditable, and replicable by other researchers. It is widely used in medicine, education, software engineering, and the social sciences to produce the most comprehensive possible evidence base on a topic.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Scientometric Analysis · Systematic Literature Review. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare