ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

SAPROF:保护因素暴力风险结构化评估×暴力风险评估指南 (VRAG)×
领域司法心理学司法心理学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20121993
提出者Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries RobbéGrant T. Harris, Marnie E. Rice, Vernon L. Quinsey
类型Clinician-ratedClinician-rated / File-based
开创性文献de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief. link ↗Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, 6(4), 269–279. DOI ↗
别名SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROFVRAG, Harris-Rice-Quinsey VRAG
相关44
摘要The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential.The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) is an actuarial instrument developed by Harris, Rice, and Quinsey (1993) to estimate the probability of violent recidivism among adult male offenders released from forensic psychiatric hospitals. It represents one of the earliest empirically validated violence prediction tools and remains widely used in correctional, forensic psychiatric, and civil commitment settings. The VRAG combines static historical variables with dynamic factors to generate a probability-based risk assessment.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: SAPROF · VRAG. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare