ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

SAPROF:保护因素暴力风险结构化评估×HCR-20v3:历史临床风险管理-20×
领域司法心理学司法心理学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20122013
提出者Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries RobbéKevin S. Douglas, Stephen D. Hart, Christopher D. Webster, et al.
类型Clinician-ratedClinician-rated
开创性文献de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief. link ↗Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., Belfrage, H., Guy, L. S., & Wilson, C. M. (2013). HCR-20v3: Assessing risk for violence. Simon Fraser University Mental Health Law Program. link ↗
别名SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROFHCR-20v3, Historical Clinical Risk Management
相关45
摘要The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential.The HCR-20v3 is a structured professional judgment framework developed by Douglas, Hart, and colleagues for the assessment of risk for violence among adolescents and adults in mental health, criminal justice, and forensic settings. Published in 2013, it represents the third version of one of the most widely validated risk assessment instruments in forensic psychology, synthesizing clinical judgment with empirical evidence of violence risk factors.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: SAPROF · HCR-20v3. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare