ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Rubric Development×Formative Assessment×
领域EducationEducation
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20071998
提出者Performance-assessment tradition (Andrade; Arter & McTighe; Jonsson & Svingby synthesis)Scriven (term); Bloom; Black & Wiliam (modern synthesis)
类型Systematic design of criterion-based scoring guides for performanceInstructional process using evidence of learning to adapt teaching and feedback
开创性文献Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. DOI ↗Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. DOI ↗
别名Scoring Rubric Design, Analytic and Holistic Rubrics, Performance Scoring Guides, Rubric ConstructionAssessment for Learning, Classroom Formative Assessment, Feedback-Based Assessment, Embedded Formative Assessment
相关44
摘要Rubric development is the systematic design of criterion-referenced scoring guides for judging complex performance such as writing, projects, presentations, and problem solving. A rubric specifies the dimensions on which work is evaluated and describes, in ordered levels, what each degree of quality looks like. Done well — as the syntheses by Andrade and by Jonsson and Svingby show — rubrics make scoring more reliable and transparent, clarify expectations for students, and turn assessment into a tool for learning rather than merely a verdict.Formative assessment, or assessment for learning, is the practice of gathering evidence of student understanding during instruction and using it immediately to adjust teaching and to give feedback that moves learning forward. Unlike summative assessment, which measures learning after the fact for grading or accountability, formative assessment is woven into the teaching cycle. Synthesized influentially by Black and Wiliam, it is defined not by the type of instrument but by whether the resulting evidence actually changes subsequent instruction and learning.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Rubric Development · Formative Assessment. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare