ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Routine Activity Theory×Journey to Crime Analysis×
领域CriminologyCriminology
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19792000
提出者Lawrence E. Cohen & Marcus FelsonD. Kim Rossmo (geographic profiling); journey-to-crime tradition
类型Theoretical framework for explaining the occurrence of predatory crimeSpatial analysis of offender travel and home-location inference
开创性文献Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. DOI ↗Rossmo, D. K. (2000). Geographic Profiling. CRC Press. ISBN: 9780849381294
别名RAT, Routine Activities Approach, Crime Triangle Framework, Cohen-Felson TheoryJourney-to-Crime Modeling, Geographic Profiling, Crime Trip Analysis, Distance-Decay Crime Analysis
相关44
摘要Routine activity theory explains predatory crime not by the supply of motivated offenders but by the everyday structure of legal activities that brings offenders, targets, and the absence of guardians together in space and time. Proposed by Lawrence Cohen and Marcus Felson in 1979, it argues that crime rates can rise even when offender motivation is constant, because changes in how people work, shop, and spend leisure time alter the opportunities for crime.Journey-to-crime analysis studies how far and where offenders travel from an anchor point — usually home — to commit crimes, and inverts that pattern to infer an unknown offender's likely base. The aggregate distance-decay regularity (most crimes occur near the offender's home, with frequency falling off with distance) underlies geographic profiling, formalized by D. Kim Rossmo in 2000 to prioritize the search for serial offenders.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Routine Activity Theory · Journey to Crime Analysis. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare