ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

ROUGH-WASPAS×准则重要性通过准则间相关性 (CRITIC)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20181995
提出者Stojić, G. Stević, Ž. Antuchevičienė, J. Pamučar, D. Vasiljević, M.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
类型Rough outranking/ranking — Rough number (lower approximation L, upper approximation U)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
开创性文献Stojić, G., Stević, Ž., Antuchevičienė, J., Pamučar, D., Vasiljević, M. (2018). A Novel Rough WASPAS Approach for Supplier Selection in a Company Manufacturing PVC Carpentry Products. Information DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要ROUGH-WASPAS (Rough-WASPAS — Rough extension of WASPAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stojić, G. Stević, Ž. Antuchevičienė, J. Pamučar, D. Vasiljević, M. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: ROUGH-WASPAS · CRITIC. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare