ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

粗糙TOPSIS×标准差法 (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20132016
提出者Song, W. Ming, X. Wu, Z.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
类型Rough outranking/ranking — Rough number (lower approximation L, upper approximation U)Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
开创性文献Song, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z. (2013). An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective environments. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要ROUGH-TOPSIS (Rough-TOPSIS — Rough extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Song, W. Ming, X. Wu, Z. in 2013. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: ROUGH-TOPSIS · CILOS. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare