ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

粗糙MABAC×准则重要性通过准则间相关性 (CRITIC)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20191995
提出者Jia, F., Liu, Y., Wang, X.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
类型IF-Rough outranking/ranking — Intuitionistic Fuzzy Rough Number (membership μ, non-membership ν)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
开创性文献Jia, F., Liu, Y., Wang, X. (2019). An extended MABAC method for multi-criteria group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy rough numbers. Expert Systems with Applications DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要ROUGH-MABAC (Rough-MABAC — Rough extension of MABAC) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Jia, F., Liu, Y., Wang, X. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: ROUGH-MABAC · CRITIC. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare