ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

岩体质量评级(RMR)×Q-系统×
领域采矿工程采矿工程
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19731974
提出者Zbigniew T. BieniawskiNick Barton (Norwegian Geotechnical Institute)
类型Empirical classification for geotechnical engineeringEmpirical index for tunnel support and stability prediction
开创性文献Bieniawski, Z. T. (1989). Engineering rock mass classifications. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0-471-60437-4Barton, N., Lien, R., & Lunde, J. (1974). Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mechanics, 6(4), 189-236. DOI ↗
别名RMR, Bieniawski Classification, RMR89Q Index, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute Classification, Barton System
相关33
摘要The Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system, developed by Zbigniew Bieniawski starting in 1973, is an empirical classification that characterizes rock mass quality and estimates mining and civil engineering behavior. RMR combines five measurable geotechnical parameters into a single index ranging from 0 to 100, where higher values indicate stronger, more stable rock masses. It is the most widely used rock classification system worldwide for underground mining design.The Q-System (NGI Index), introduced by Nick Barton and colleagues at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute in 1974, is an alternative rock mass classification to RMR. It combines six parameters into a dimensionless index Q ranging from 0.001 to 1000, where higher Q values indicate better rock quality. The Q-System is particularly valued for tunnel and underground excavation design due to its explicit consideration of joint roughness and groundwater effects.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Rock Mass Rating · Q-System. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare