方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 稳健结构方程模型× | 验证性因子分析(CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 统计学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1994 | 1969 |
| 提出者≠ | Albert Satorra & Peter M. Bentler | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| 类型≠ | Latent variable / path model with robust inference | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| 开创性文献≠ | Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis (pp. 399–419). Sage. link ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | Robust SEM, SEM with robust standard errors, Satorra-Bentler SEM, non-normal SEM | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Robust structural equation modeling (Robust SEM) applies the full SEM framework — simultaneous estimation of measurement and structural relations among latent variables — while using corrected test statistics and sandwich standard errors that remain valid when observed data depart from multivariate normality. The Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square is the most widely used correction. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|