ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

稳健性敏感性分析×拉丁超立方体采样×
领域仿真仿真
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990s–2000s1979
提出者Saltelli, A. and colleagues
类型Simulation-based robustness assessment pipelineStratified space-filling sampling design
开创性文献Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. (2008). Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer. Wiley. ISBN: 9780470059975McKay, M.D., Beckman, R.J. & Conover, W.J. (1979). A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code. Technometrics, 21(2), 239-245. DOI ↗
别名RSA, Robust SA, Sensitivity Analysis under Uncertainty, Uncertainty-robust sensitivity analysisLHS, Latin Hiperküp Örnekleme (LHS) ve Duyarlılık Analizi, stratified sampling design, space-filling design
相关34
摘要Robust Sensitivity Analysis (RSA) systematically evaluates how much variation in model outputs can be attributed to uncertainty or variation in model inputs, with an explicit focus on conclusions that remain valid across a wide range of plausible input conditions. It goes beyond standard sensitivity analysis by asking not only which inputs matter most, but which findings are truly robust — stable regardless of assumptions made under uncertainty.Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) is a stratified space-filling design for computer experiments, introduced by McKay, Beckman, and Conover in 1979. It divides each input variable's range into equally probable strata and draws exactly one sample per stratum, ensuring that the full input space is covered with far fewer model evaluations than standard Monte Carlo simulation requires. It is routinely paired with global sensitivity analysis — particularly Sobol indices — to quantify how much each input drives output variability.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Robust Sensitivity Analysis · Latin Hypercube Sampling. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare