ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

稳健倾向得分加权法×双重稳健估计(AIPW)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1994–20192005
提出者Robins, Rotnitzky, & Zhao (foundational augmented IPW); Zhao, Small, & Bhattacharya (sensitivity-robust IPW)Robins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins
类型Robust causal weighting estimatorSemiparametric causal estimator
开创性文献Robins, J. M., Rotnitzky, A., & Zhao, L. P. (1994). Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(427), 846-866. DOI ↗Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129. DOI ↗
别名robust PSW, robust IPW, robustness-augmented propensity score weighting, misspecification-robust weightingAIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW)
相关65
摘要Robust Propensity Score Weighting extends standard inverse probability weighting by incorporating safeguards against misspecification of the propensity score model and extreme weights. It combines techniques such as weight trimming, overlap weighting, or augmented outcome models to ensure that causal effect estimates remain reliable even when the propensity score model is imperfectly specified.Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Robust Propensity Score Weighting · Doubly Robust Estimation. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare