ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

稳健功效分析×效应量分析×
领域统计学统计学
方法族Hypothesis testHypothesis test
起源年份1990s–2000s1969 (first edition); 1988 (definitive second edition)
提出者Rand R. Wilcox and colleaguesJacob Cohen
类型Power and sample-size planningStandardized magnitude estimation
开创性文献Luh, W.-M., & Guo, J.-H. (2010). Approximate sample size formulas for the two-sample trimmed mean test with unequal variances. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(1), 83–100. link ↗Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805802832
别名power analysis under non-normality, distribution-free power analysis, robust sample-size determination, contamination-robust powereffect magnitude estimation, standardized effect measure, practical significance analysis, ES analysis
相关44
摘要Robust power analysis computes the statistical power or required sample size for hypothesis tests that use robust estimators — such as trimmed means or Winsorized variances — instead of ordinary means and standard deviations. It protects against inflated or deflated power estimates that arise when data contain outliers, heavy tails, or skewness that violate classical normality assumptions.Effect size analysis quantifies the practical magnitude of a statistical result independently of sample size. Rather than asking only whether a difference or relationship is statistically significant, it asks how large it is, using standardized indices such as Cohen's d, eta-squared, omega-squared, or Pearson's r that allow direct comparison across studies and populations.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Robust power analysis · Effect size analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare