ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

稳健路径分析×稳健的验证性因子分析×
领域统计学统计学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份19981984–1994
提出者Yuan & Bentler (robust SEM/path framework); Huber (M-estimation foundation)Satorra & Bentler (robust SE/chi-square corrections); Browne (ADF estimator)
类型Causal path modeling with robust estimationConfirmatory latent variable model with robust estimation
开创性文献Yuan, K.-H. & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Robust mean and covariance structure analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51(1), 63–88. DOI ↗Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage. link ↗
别名robust PA, path analysis with robust standard errors, robust causal path modeling, robust structural path modelingRobust CFA, CFA with robust standard errors, Satorra-Bentler CFA, non-normal CFA
相关66
摘要Robust path analysis applies robust estimation — such as sandwich standard errors or M-estimation — to path models that specify directed causal relationships among observed variables. It preserves valid inference about path coefficients and indirect effects when data violate normality, contain outliers, or exhibit heteroscedasticity that would distort conventional standard errors.Robust confirmatory factor analysis fits a pre-specified factor structure to observed data while correcting standard errors and goodness-of-fit statistics for violations of multivariate normality. It is the preferred variant of CFA whenever Likert-type, skewed, or kurtotic indicators make the classical normal-theory estimator unreliable.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Robust Path Analysis · Robust Confirmatory Factor Analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare