ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

稳健频率分析×稳健卡方检验×
领域统计学统计学
方法族Hypothesis testHypothesis test
起源年份1970s–1980s (foundations); applied to frequency analysis throughout the 1990s–2000s1984 (power divergence); 1900 (Pearson baseline)
提出者Huber, Hampel, Wilcox and the robust statistics traditionCressie & Read (power divergence framework); Pearson chi-square extended by multiple authors
类型Robust descriptive and inferential procedureRobust categorical association / goodness-of-fit test
开创性文献Wilcox, R. R. (2012). Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing (3rd ed.). Academic Press. ISBN: 978-0123869838Cressie, N., & Read, T. R. C. (1984). Multinomial goodness-of-fit tests. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 46(3), 440–464. DOI ↗
别名robust count analysis, outlier-resistant frequency analysis, robust distributional analysisrobust chi-squared test, Cressie-Read power divergence test, adjusted chi-square test, robust contingency test
相关33
摘要Robust frequency analysis applies outlier-resistant estimation and resampling or exact methods to the counting and tabulation of categorical data, reducing the distortion caused by extreme observations, sparse cells, or violations of large-sample assumptions that can make conventional frequency summaries misleading.The robust chi-square test extends the classic Pearson chi-square framework to remain reliable when standard assumptions — especially the minimum expected-cell-count rule — are violated. Using power divergence statistics (Cressie & Read, 1984) or resampling-based corrections, it produces valid inferences for sparse contingency tables, small samples, and unbalanced categorical data where the ordinary chi-square approximation breaks down.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Robust frequency analysis · Robust chi-square test. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare