ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

稳健效应量分析×稳健单因素方差分析×
领域统计学统计学
方法族Hypothesis testHypothesis test
起源年份2005 (formalized)1951 (Welch); 1990s–2000s (trimmed-mean variants)
提出者Algina, Keselman & Penfield; WilcoxB. L. Welch; R. R. Wilcox (trimmed-mean extension)
类型Robust effect size estimationRobust parametric group comparison
开创性文献Algina, J., Keselman, H. J., & Penfield, R. D. (2005). An alternative to Cohen's standardized mean difference effect size: A robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case. Psychological Methods, 10(3), 317–328. DOI ↗Wilcox, R. R. (2012). Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing (3rd ed.). Academic Press. ISBN: 978-0123869838
别名robust Cohen's d, trimmed-mean effect size, outlier-resistant effect size, robust standardized mean differencetrimmed-mean ANOVA, Welch one-way ANOVA, heteroscedastic one-way ANOVA, robust ANOVA
相关52
摘要Robust effect size analysis quantifies the magnitude of a difference or association using estimators that are resistant to outliers and violations of normality. Rather than relying on classical statistics such as Cohen's d based on sample means and standard deviations, robust variants use trimmed means and Winsorized standard deviations to produce effect size estimates that accurately reflect the typical effect rather than being inflated by extreme values.Robust one-way ANOVA compares the central tendency of three or more independent groups while resisting the distorting effects of outliers and heterogeneous variances. By replacing ordinary means with trimmed means and ordinary variances with Winsorized variances, it maintains accurate Type I error control and strong power when classical ANOVA assumptions are violated.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Robust Effect Size Analysis · Robust one-way ANOVA. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare