方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 稳健区分效度× | 聚合效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1959 (foundational); 2015 (HTMT criterion) | 1959 |
| 提出者≠ | Henseler, Ringle & Sarstedt (HTMT); Campbell & Fiske (foundational framework) | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske |
| 类型≠ | Validity assessment / measurement quality criterion | Validity evidence / construct validation |
| 开创性文献≠ | Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | HTMT criterion, heterotrait-monotrait ratio, discriminant validity testing, RDV | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Robust discriminant validity assessment determines whether distinct latent constructs in a measurement model are sufficiently different from one another. Unlike traditional AVE-based approaches, robust methods such as the Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT) ratio use the pattern of inter-indicator correlations to provide a more sensitive and simulation-validated criterion for judging discriminant validity in structural equation modeling contexts. | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|