ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

稳健内容效度评估×量表开发×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1975 (base); 2000s–2010s (robust extensions)1991–1995
提出者Grounded in Lawshe (1975) CVR framework; robust extensions draw on Huber, Wilcox, and robust statistics traditionMultiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David Watson
类型Validity evidence / expert judgement procedure with outlier-resistant aggregationMulti-step methodological framework
开创性文献Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569
别名robust CVR, outlier-resistant content validity, robust content validity index, robust expert-panel validationquestionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale building
相关65
摘要Robust content validity assessment applies outlier-resistant statistical methods to the aggregation of expert panel ratings in content validation studies. By detecting and down-weighting idiosyncratic or extreme rater judgements, it yields Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) estimates that reflect the consensus of the panel more accurately than standard averaging when one or a few raters deviate sharply from the group.Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Robust Content Validity · Scale development. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare