方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 稳健内容效度评估× | 判别效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1975 (base); 2000s–2010s (robust extensions) | 1959 |
| 提出者≠ | Grounded in Lawshe (1975) CVR framework; robust extensions draw on Huber, Wilcox, and robust statistics tradition | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| 类型≠ | Validity evidence / expert judgement procedure with outlier-resistant aggregation | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| 开创性文献≠ | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | robust CVR, outlier-resistant content validity, robust content validity index, robust expert-panel validation | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Robust content validity assessment applies outlier-resistant statistical methods to the aggregation of expert panel ratings in content validation studies. By detecting and down-weighting idiosyncratic or extreme rater judgements, it yields Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) estimates that reflect the consensus of the panel more accurately than standard averaging when one or a few raters deviate sharply from the group. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|