方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 稳健内容效度评估× | 内容效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1975 (base); 2000s–2010s (robust extensions) | 1975 |
| 提出者≠ | Grounded in Lawshe (1975) CVR framework; robust extensions draw on Huber, Wilcox, and robust statistics tradition | C. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurement |
| 类型≠ | Validity evidence / expert judgement procedure with outlier-resistant aggregation | Validity evidence / expert judgement procedure |
| 开创性文献 | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ |
| 别名 | robust CVR, outlier-resistant content validity, robust content validity index, robust expert-panel validation | content-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validation |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Robust content validity assessment applies outlier-resistant statistical methods to the aggregation of expert panel ratings in content validation studies. By detecting and down-weighting idiosyncratic or extreme rater judgements, it yields Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) estimates that reflect the consensus of the panel more accurately than standard averaging when one or a few raters deviate sharply from the group. | Content validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|