ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于风险的故障树分析×失效模式与影响分析 (FMEA)×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1961 (FTA origin); risk-based integration formalised 1975–19811949 (military); widespread industrial adoption 1970s–1980s
提出者H.A. Watson (Bell Labs) and developed further by Boeing/U.S. Air Force; risk-based extension via NRC probabilistic risk assessment programsU.S. Military / NASA (formalized by MIL-P-1629, 1949)
类型Quantitative safety and reliability analysisProactive risk analysis technique
开创性文献Vesely, W. E., Goldberg, F. F., Roberts, N. H., & Haasl, D. F. (1981). Fault Tree Handbook. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG-0492. link ↗Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution (2nd ed.). ASQ Quality Press. ISBN: 978-0873895989
别名RB-FTA, risk-informed FTA, quantitative fault tree analysis, probabilistic fault tree analysisFMEA, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis, FMECA, Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis
相关66
摘要Risk-based fault tree analysis (RB-FTA) combines classical fault tree analysis with explicit quantitative risk assessment. Starting from an undesired top event, the analyst decomposes it into contributing causes using AND/OR logic gates, assigns failure probabilities to basic events from reliability databases or historical data, and then propagates those probabilities through the tree to compute top-event likelihood. The result is expressed as risk — probability weighted by consequence severity — enabling prioritisation of safety interventions by their actual risk reduction impact.Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a structured, proactive risk management technique used to identify potential failure modes in a system, process, or product design, evaluate their consequences, and prioritize corrective actions before failures occur. Originally developed for the U.S. military in 1949 and later adopted by NASA, automotive, and manufacturing industries, FMEA is now a cornerstone quality-engineering tool embedded in standards such as AIAG-VDA and ISO 9001-aligned processes.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Risk-based fault tree analysis · Failure Mode and Effects Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare