ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于风险的中心复合设计×统计可靠性分析×
领域实验设计可靠性
方法族Process / pipelineRegression model
起源年份1951 (CCD); risk-based integration emerged in applied engineering literature from the 1990s onward1998
提出者Foundational CCD: George E. P. Box & K. B. Wilson (1951); risk integration adapted from engineering risk analysis traditionsWilliam Meeker & Luis Escobar
类型Experimental design with integrated risk assessmentParametric lifetime modeling
开创性文献Box, G. E. P., & Wilson, K. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 13(1), 1–45. DOI ↗Meeker, W. Q., & Escobar, L. A. (1998). Statistical Methods for Reliability Data. Wiley. ISBN: 978-0-471-14328-4
别名Risk-informed CCD, CCD with risk assessment, Uncertainty-aware central composite design, Risk-integrated RSMLife Data Analysis, Survival Analysis (Engineering), Time-to-Failure Analysis, Güvenilirlik Analizi
相关53
摘要Risk-based Central Composite Design (Risk-based CCD) integrates formal risk identification and uncertainty quantification into the classical CCD framework. By coupling the rotatable second-order experimental structure of CCD with probabilistic risk metrics, engineers and scientists can simultaneously optimize process responses and characterize the risk of unacceptable outcomes — making it particularly valuable in regulated industries such as pharmaceuticals, chemical engineering, and advanced manufacturing.Statistical reliability analysis models the time-to-failure of components, systems, or products using parametric lifetime distributions fitted to observed or censored failure data. Formalized comprehensively by William Q. Meeker and Luis A. Escobar in their 1998 Wiley monograph, the framework integrates maximum likelihood estimation, censoring mechanisms, and distributional diagnostics to produce probability-of-failure curves, hazard rates, and quantile estimates that support design, warranty, and maintenance decisions.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Risk-based central composite design · Reliability Analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare