ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于风险的中心复合设计×失效模式与影响分析 (FMEA)×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1951 (CCD); risk-based integration emerged in applied engineering literature from the 1990s onward1949 (military); widespread industrial adoption 1970s–1980s
提出者Foundational CCD: George E. P. Box & K. B. Wilson (1951); risk integration adapted from engineering risk analysis traditionsU.S. Military / NASA (formalized by MIL-P-1629, 1949)
类型Experimental design with integrated risk assessmentProactive risk analysis technique
开创性文献Box, G. E. P., & Wilson, K. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 13(1), 1–45. DOI ↗Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution (2nd ed.). ASQ Quality Press. ISBN: 978-0873895989
别名Risk-informed CCD, CCD with risk assessment, Uncertainty-aware central composite design, Risk-integrated RSMFMEA, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis, FMECA, Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis
相关56
摘要Risk-based Central Composite Design (Risk-based CCD) integrates formal risk identification and uncertainty quantification into the classical CCD framework. By coupling the rotatable second-order experimental structure of CCD with probabilistic risk metrics, engineers and scientists can simultaneously optimize process responses and characterize the risk of unacceptable outcomes — making it particularly valuable in regulated industries such as pharmaceuticals, chemical engineering, and advanced manufacturing.Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a structured, proactive risk management technique used to identify potential failure modes in a system, process, or product design, evaluate their consequences, and prioritize corrective actions before failures occur. Originally developed for the U.S. military in 1949 and later adopted by NASA, automotive, and manufacturing industries, FMEA is now a cornerstone quality-engineering tool embedded in standards such as AIAG-VDA and ISO 9001-aligned processes.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Risk-based central composite design · Failure Mode and Effects Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare