ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

风险调整生态研究×风险调整队列研究×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1980s–1990sMid–late 20th century (risk-adjusted cohort designs systematized by 1970s–1990s)
提出者Extension of ecological study methodology; risk adjustment concepts formalized by Morgenstern (1982) and developed further in health outcomes researchEvolution of cohort study methodology; risk adjustment formalized through work of Rothman, Greenland, and others in epidemiology, 20th century
类型Observational ecological design with statistical confounding controlObservational epidemiological study design with statistical confounding control
开创性文献Morgenstern, H. (1982). Uses of ecologic analysis in epidemiologic research. American Journal of Public Health, 72(12), 1336–1344. DOI ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
别名risk-adjusted ecological analysis, confounder-adjusted ecological study, ecological regression with risk adjustment, adjusted area-level studyadjusted cohort study, covariate-adjusted cohort, risk-controlled prospective study, propensity-adjusted cohort
相关44
摘要A risk-adjusted ecological study is an observational epidemiological design that examines associations between exposures and outcomes measured at the group or area level — such as regions, hospitals, or countries — while statistically controlling for known risk factors also measured at that level. By incorporating risk adjustment through ecological regression or standardization, the design reduces (though cannot eliminate) confounding from group-level variables, enabling more valid comparisons across populations or settings.A risk-adjusted cohort study is an observational epidemiological design in which a defined group of individuals is followed over time to compare outcomes between exposed and unexposed subgroups, with statistical methods applied to control for measured confounders. Adjustment strategies — including multivariable regression, propensity score matching, inverse probability weighting, or standardization — are used to reduce bias and produce effect estimates that more closely approximate what would be observed in a randomized trial.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Risk-adjusted ecological study · Risk-adjusted cohort study. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare