ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

风险调整队列研究×倾向得分匹配×
领域流行病学研究统计学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Mid–late 20th century (risk-adjusted cohort designs systematized by 1970s–1990s)1983
提出者Evolution of cohort study methodology; risk adjustment formalized through work of Rothman, Greenland, and others in epidemiology, 20th centuryPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
类型Observational epidemiological study design with statistical confounding controlMethod
开创性文献Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
别名adjusted cohort study, covariate-adjusted cohort, risk-controlled prospective study, propensity-adjusted cohortPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
相关43
摘要A risk-adjusted cohort study is an observational epidemiological design in which a defined group of individuals is followed over time to compare outcomes between exposed and unexposed subgroups, with statistical methods applied to control for measured confounders. Adjustment strategies — including multivariable regression, propensity score matching, inverse probability weighting, or standardization — are used to reduce bias and produce effect estimates that more closely approximate what would be observed in a randomized trial.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Risk-adjusted cohort study · Propensity Score Matching. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare