ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

回顾性竞争风险分析×回顾性生存分析×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1978 (cause-specific); 1999 (subdistribution/Fine-Gray)1970s–1980s (retrospective variant established)
提出者Fine & Gray (subdistribution model); Prentice et al. (cause-specific framework)Kaplan & Meier (foundational estimator, 1958); Cox (regression model, 1972); retrospective application is a design variant documented since the 1970s
类型Retrospective observational survival analysisRetrospective observational analytical study
开创性文献Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗Collett, D. (2015). Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research (3rd ed.). CRC Press. ISBN: 978-1439856789
别名retrospective CRA, competing risks survival analysis (retrospective), cause-specific hazard analysis (retrospective), subdistribution hazard analysis (retrospective)historical survival study, retrospective time-to-event analysis, retrospective follow-up survival study, archival survival analysis
相关45
摘要Retrospective competing risks analysis applies competing risks methodology to historical (already-collected) time-to-event data in which subjects can experience one of several mutually exclusive endpoints. It uses the cumulative incidence function and cause-specific or subdistribution hazard models to estimate the probability of each event type while accounting for the fact that occurrence of one event permanently precludes the others. Widely used in oncology, cardiology, and transplant medicine where administrative or registry records are the data source.Retrospective survival analysis applies time-to-event statistical methods — most commonly the Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazards regression — to data collected from past records rather than through prospective follow-up. The researcher looks back at medical records, disease registries, or administrative databases to reconstruct each patient's journey from a defined starting point (e.g., diagnosis or surgery) to an outcome of interest (e.g., death, relapse, or hospital readmission), making it a cost-efficient approach for studying prognosis and risk factors when prospective follow-up is not feasible.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Retrospective competing risks analysis · Retrospective survival analysis. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare