ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

回顾性竞争风险分析×回顾性队列研究×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1978 (cause-specific); 1999 (subdistribution/Fine-Gray)Mid-20th century (widely formalized 1950s–1970s)
提出者Fine & Gray (subdistribution model); Prentice et al. (cause-specific framework)Systematic use attributed to early 20th-century occupational epidemiology; formalized in modern epidemiological theory by Brian MacMahon and others
类型Retrospective observational survival analysisObservational analytic study
开创性文献Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
别名retrospective CRA, competing risks survival analysis (retrospective), cause-specific hazard analysis (retrospective), subdistribution hazard analysis (retrospective)historical cohort study, non-concurrent cohort study, retrospective follow-up study, historical prospective study
相关46
摘要Retrospective competing risks analysis applies competing risks methodology to historical (already-collected) time-to-event data in which subjects can experience one of several mutually exclusive endpoints. It uses the cumulative incidence function and cause-specific or subdistribution hazard models to estimate the probability of each event type while accounting for the fact that occurrence of one event permanently precludes the others. Widely used in oncology, cardiology, and transplant medicine where administrative or registry records are the data source.A retrospective cohort study assembles a group of individuals who share a common starting point and reconstructs their exposure history and subsequent outcomes entirely from pre-existing records. Because the data have already been collected before the study begins, the design is far faster and cheaper than a prospective cohort; however, the researcher must work with whatever information was recorded at the time rather than collecting purpose-built measurements.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Retrospective competing risks analysis · Retrospective Cohort Study. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare