ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Results-Based Management×Theory-Based Impact Evaluation×
领域Development StudiesDevelopment Studies
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20022009
提出者OECD-DAC; United Nations Development Group; aid-effectiveness agenda (Paris Declaration / Accra)Carol Weiss; Howard White (3ie)
类型Management and evaluation strategy for development resultsEvaluation approach / framework
开创性文献OECD-DAC (2002). Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results Based Management. OECD Development Assistance Committee, Paris. link ↗White, H. (2009). Theory-Based Impact Evaluation: Principles and Practice. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 1(3), 271–284. DOI ↗
别名RBM, Managing for Development Results, Managing for Results, Results Framework ApproachTheory of Change Evaluation, Contribution Analysis, Theory-Driven Evaluation, Causal-Chain Impact Evaluation
相关44
摘要Results-Based Management (RBM) is a management strategy that orients all the activities, resources, and processes of an organisation or programme toward achieving and demonstrating clearly defined results, rather than merely tracking inputs delivered and activities completed. Codified in the OECD-DAC's 2002 evaluation glossary and adopted across the United Nations, the World Bank, and bilateral agencies, it embeds a results chain, performance indicators, and continuous monitoring into the full project cycle so that evidence on outcomes feeds back into decisions.Theory-based impact evaluation evaluates a programme by first making explicit the theory of change — the causal chain of assumptions and mechanisms through which inputs are expected to produce outcomes and impacts — and then gathering evidence to test whether each link in that chain holds. Rather than treating the programme as a black box and estimating only the net effect, it asks not just whether a programme worked but why, for whom, and under what conditions. Articulated by Carol Weiss and brought into development practice by Howard White and 3ie, it complements, rather than competes with, counterfactual designs.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Results-Based Management · Theory-Based Impact Evaluation. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare