方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 研究日志× | Braun & Clarke 的反思性主题分析法× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 调查方法论 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology | 2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019 |
| 提出者≠ | Robert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment) | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative data collection and reflexivity tool | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83. link ↗ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | researcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diary | RTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument. | Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|