ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

正则化迁移学习×正则化随机森林×
领域机器学习机器学习
方法族Machine learningMachine learning
起源年份2000s–2010s2012
提出者Pan, S. J. & Yang, Q. (survey); regularization variants by multiple authorsDeng, H. & Runger, G.
类型Regularized supervised/semi-supervised learning frameworkRegularized ensemble (penalized feature selection in trees)
开创性文献Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010). A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(10), 1345–1359. DOI ↗Deng, H., & Runger, G. (2012). Feature selection via regularized trees. Proceedings of the 2012 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), IEEE, pp. 1–8. DOI ↗
别名regularized domain adaptation, transfer learning with regularization, penalized transfer learning, regularized fine-tuningRRF, Guided Regularized Random Forest, GRRF, regularized tree ensemble
相关65
摘要Regularized Transfer Learning applies explicit penalty terms to a transfer learning pipeline to control how much a model shifts away from source-domain knowledge when adapting to a new target domain. The regularizer discourages negative transfer — the harmful carry-over of irrelevant source patterns — while preserving beneficial shared representations and preventing overfitting when target-domain labels are scarce.Regularized Random Forest (RRF), introduced by Deng and Runger in 2012, extends the standard Random Forest by adding a penalty that discourages splits on features not already used in the ensemble. This built-in regularization produces sparser, less redundant feature subsets, making the model especially valuable when feature selection is as important as predictive accuracy.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Regularized Transfer Learning · Regularized random forest. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare