ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

回归断点设计 (Regression Discontinuity Design, RDD)×倾向得分匹配×
领域因果推断研究统计学
方法族Regression modelProcess / pipeline
起源年份20081983
提出者Imbens & Lemieux (guide to practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik (practical introduction)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
类型Quasi-experimental causal designMethod
开创性文献Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
别名RDD, regression discontinuity design, sharp RDD, fuzzy RDDPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
相关53
摘要Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that identifies a causal effect by locally comparing units just above and just below a cutoff on a continuous assignment (running) variable. Formalised for applied work by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and developed as a practical framework by Cattaneo, Idrobo, and Titiunik (2020), it estimates a local average treatment effect (LATE) at the threshold.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Regression Discontinuity · Propensity Score Matching. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare