ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于成对政权分析的序数多标准方法×CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19832025
提出者Hinloopen, E., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P.Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N.
类型Pairwise regime matrix aggregation (ordinal weights)Impact-based weighted scoring (criterion-level deviation analysis)
开创性文献Hinloopen, E., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. (1983). Qualitative discrete multiple criteria choice models in regional planning. Regional Science and Urban Economics DOI ↗Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. (2025). A New Criteria Importance Assessment (CIMAS) Method in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making: Criteria Evaluation for Supplier Selection. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS — Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要REGIME (Ordinal multi-criteria method based on pairwise regime analysis) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Hinloopen, E., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. in 1983. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. in 2025. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: REGIME · CIMAS. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare