方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Braun & Clarke 的反思性主题分析法× | 主题分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019 | 2006 |
| 提出者≠ | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| 开创性文献 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | RTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|