方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Braun & Clarke 的反思性主题分析法× | 话语分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019 | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| 提出者≠ | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | RTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 2 |
| 摘要≠ | Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|