方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| RE-AIM框架× | 规范化过程理论 (NPT)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 实施科学 | 实施科学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1999 | 2006 |
| 提出者≠ | Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., and colleagues | May, C. R. |
| 类型 | Framework | Framework |
| 开创性文献≠ | Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1322-1327. DOI ↗ | May, C. R. (2006). A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research, 6, 86. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | RE-AIM, REAIM, Glasgow framework | NPT, normalization theory, routinization |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | The RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) is a five-dimension evaluation tool designed to assess the public health impact of evidence-based interventions in real-world settings. Developed by Glasgow et al. (1999) to address the gap between efficacy trials (controlled conditions) and effectiveness in practice, RE-AIM provides a comprehensive set of metrics to determine whether an intervention is 'worth it' from both scientific and practical perspectives. It has become the standard framework for evaluating implementation success across health domains. | Normalization Process Theory (NPT) is a sociological framework developed by Carl May and colleagues to explain how new interventions become routinely embedded ('normalized') in organizational and clinical practice. Unlike efficiency-focused frameworks that measure adoption and fidelity, NPT explains the social processes through which interventions transition from external innovations to normal practice. NPT identifies four key mechanisms (Coherence, Cognitive Participation, Collective Action, Reflexive Monitoring) that collectively determine whether an intervention becomes 'the way we do things here' or remains a temporary project. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|