ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Randomized Response Technique×Survey Experiment×
领域Political SciencePolitical Science
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19652011
提出者Stanley L. WarnerExperimental political science; synthesized by Diana Mutz
类型Sensitive-question survey techniqueRandomized experiment embedded in a survey
开创性文献Warner, S. L. (1965). Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60(309), 63–69. DOI ↗Mutz, D. C. (2011). Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691144528
别名RRT, Randomized response, Warner's randomized response, Forced-response techniquePopulation-based survey experiment, Survey-embedded experiment, Question-wording experiment, Framing experiment
相关34
摘要The randomized response technique (RRT) is a survey method for asking about sensitive or stigmatized topics while guaranteeing each respondent's privacy. Introduced by Stanley Warner in 1965, it uses a randomizing device — a coin, die, or spinner — to determine, privately and unknown to the interviewer, whether the respondent answers the sensitive question or an alternative. Because the analyst knows only the probability distribution of the device and not the outcome for any individual, no answer can be traced to a particular question, yet the population prevalence of the sensitive trait can be recovered exactly by inverting the known randomization.A survey experiment embeds a randomized experiment inside a survey: respondents are randomly assigned to different versions of a question, frame, or stimulus, and their answers are compared to estimate a causal effect. By combining the internal validity of randomization with the representative samples and rich measurement of survey research, survey experiments — especially population-based ones — let political scientists draw causal inferences about how information, framing, or message attributes shape public attitudes and behavior.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Randomized Response Technique · Survey Experiment. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare