方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 随机效应面板模型× | Hausman规格检验（固定效应 vs 随机效应）× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 计量经济学 | 计量经济学 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份 | 1978 | 1978 |
| 提出者≠ | Baltagi (textbook treatment); Hausman specification test | Jerry A. Hausman |
| 类型≠ | Panel data regression | Specification test for panel data models |
| 开创性文献≠ | Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271. DOI ↗ | Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | random effects panel regression, RE estimator, GLS panel estimator, Panel Rassal Etkiler Modeli | Hausman specification test, FE vs RE test, Durbin-Wu-Hausman test, Hausman Spesifikasyon Testi (FE vs RE) |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | The random effects model is a panel data estimator that explains an outcome using both within-unit and between-unit variation, treating the unobserved unit-specific heterogeneity as a random, normally distributed term rather than a fixed parameter. Its validity is judged with the Hausman (1978) specification test, and it is developed in standard treatments such as Baltagi's Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. | The Hausman test is a specification test, introduced by Jerry A. Hausman in 1978, that decides between the fixed-effects (FE) and random-effects (RE) estimators in panel data models. The null hypothesis is that the random-effects estimator is consistent and efficient and should be preferred; the alternative is that random effects is inconsistent and fixed effects is required because the unit-specific effects are correlated with the explanatory variables. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|