ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Queer Methodology×批判性话语分析 (CDA)×
领域Gender Studies质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2010Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
提出者Kath Browne, Catherine J. Nash, Jack HalberstamNorman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
类型Critical anti-normative research methodologyQualitative research method
开创性文献Browne, K., & Nash, C. J. (Eds.) (2010). Queer Methods and Methodologies: Intersecting Queer Theories and Social Science Research. Ashgate, Surrey. ISBN: 9780754678434Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗
别名Queer Methods, Queer Research MethodologyCDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
相关46
摘要Queer methodology is less a fixed technique than a critical stance toward research that disrupts taken-for-granted categories of sex, gender, and sexuality and resists the assumption that identities are stable, knowable, and countable. Articulated for the social sciences in Kath Browne and Catherine Nash's Queer Methods and Methodologies (2010) and prefigured in Jack Halberstam's notion of a 'scavenger' methodology, it asks not 'what is the right method?' but 'how does research itself reproduce normativity?' — and licenses researchers to borrow and combine methods rhizomatically in order to attend to fluidity, ambiguity, and the very production of the normal.Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Queer Methodology · Critical Discourse Analysis. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare