方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Queer Methodology× | 批判性话语分析 (CDA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | Gender Studies | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2010 | Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995) |
| 提出者≠ | Kath Browne, Catherine J. Nash, Jack Halberstam | Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak |
| 类型≠ | Critical anti-normative research methodology | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Browne, K., & Nash, C. J. (Eds.) (2010). Queer Methods and Methodologies: Intersecting Queer Theories and Social Science Research. Ashgate, Surrey. ISBN: 9780754678434 | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | Queer Methods, Queer Research Methodology | CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 4 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Queer methodology is less a fixed technique than a critical stance toward research that disrupts taken-for-granted categories of sex, gender, and sexuality and resists the assumption that identities are stable, knowable, and countable. Articulated for the social sciences in Kath Browne and Catherine Nash's Queer Methods and Methodologies (2010) and prefigured in Jack Halberstam's notion of a 'scavenger' methodology, it asks not 'what is the right method?' but 'how does research itself reproduce normativity?' — and licenses researchers to borrow and combine methods rhizomatically in order to attend to fluidity, ambiguity, and the very production of the normal. | Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|