ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

定量主导的实用混合方法设计×混合方法元推断×
领域研究设计研究设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1998–20101998–2003
提出者Tashakkori & Teddlie (mixed methods paradigm discourse); pragmatic strand systematized by Morgan and CreswellAbbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie
类型Mixed methods research designMixed methods integration procedure
开创性文献Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972666Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761930129
别名QUAN-dominant pragmatic MMR, pragmatic quantitative-priority mixed design, quan-priority pragmatic designmeta-inference, mixed methods overall inference, integrated inference, MMR meta-inference
相关66
摘要A mixed methods design in which quantitative data and analysis carry the primary explanatory weight while a smaller qualitative component provides contextual depth. Grounded in philosophical pragmatism, design decisions — including timing, sequencing, and the scope of each strand — are driven by what best answers the research question rather than by adherence to a single paradigmatic tradition.Mixed methods meta-inference is the overarching conclusion drawn at the end of a mixed methods study by systematically combining and integrating the separate inferences produced by the quantitative and qualitative strands. It represents the highest-level interpretive act in mixed methods research: moving beyond strand-specific findings to produce a unified, coherent understanding of the research problem that neither strand could yield alone.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Quantitative-dominant pragmatic mixed methods · Mixed Methods Meta-Inference. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare