方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 定性优先混合方法设计× | 定量优先混合方法设计× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究设计 | 研究设计 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1991–2003 (formalized in mixed methods typologies) | 2003–2009 |
| 提出者≠ | Janice Morse; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark | Creswell & Plano Clark; Teddlie & Tashakkori |
| 类型 | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| 开创性文献 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| 别名 | QUAL-dominant mixed methods, qualitative-dominant mixed design, qual-priority MMR, qualitative-weighted mixed methods | QUAN-dominant mixed methods, quantitative-dominant mixed methods, quan-priority design, quantitative-first mixed methods |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Qualitative-priority mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which qualitative inquiry carries the greater weight — in terms of volume, analytical depth, and interpretive authority — while a supplementary quantitative strand provides supporting evidence. The design acknowledges that the phenomenon under study is best understood through meaning-making, lived experience, or social processes, with numbers used to corroborate or contextualize, not to dominate, the research story. | Quantitative-priority mixed methods design is a research approach in which quantitative data and analysis carry the primary explanatory weight, while qualitative data play a supplementary or corroborating role. The researcher collects and analyzes quantitative data first (or concurrently with greater emphasis), then uses qualitative findings to elaborate, explain, or contextualize the statistical results. Priority and sequence together define where integration occurs and how each strand informs the other. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|