ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

定性优先混合方法设计×案例研究×
领域研究设计质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1991–2003 (formalized in mixed methods typologies)1984 (seminal codification)
提出者Janice Morse; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano ClarkRobert K. Yin (systematised in Case Study Research, 1984)
类型Mixed methods research designQualitative research design
开创性文献Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379Yin, R.K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169
别名QUAL-dominant mixed methods, qualitative-dominant mixed design, qual-priority MMR, qualitative-weighted mixed methodsVaka Çalışması (Case Study), case study design, case study methodology
相关65
摘要Qualitative-priority mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which qualitative inquiry carries the greater weight — in terms of volume, analytical depth, and interpretive authority — while a supplementary quantitative strand provides supporting evidence. The design acknowledges that the phenomenon under study is best understood through meaning-making, lived experience, or social processes, with numbers used to corroborate or contextualize, not to dominate, the research story.Case study research is a qualitative research design that investigates a specific phenomenon, individual, group, organisation, or event in depth within its real-world context. Systematised by Robert K. Yin in 1984, it supports single-case and multiple-case designs and draws on multiple data sources — interviews, observation, documents, and artefacts — to build a rich, contextualised account of a bounded unit.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Qualitative-priority mixed methods design · Case Study. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare