方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 定性主导的转型性混合方法设计× | 转型混合方法设计× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究设计 | 研究设计 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2003–2010 | 2003–2009 |
| 提出者≠ | Donna M. Mertens (transformative framework); John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (weighting typology) | Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| 类型 | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative Research and Evaluation. Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1593856267 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| 别名 | QUAL-dominant transformative MMR, qualitative-priority transformative design, QUAL+ transformative mixed methods, transformative mixed methods with qualitative priority | transformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Qualitative-dominant transformative mixed methods is a mixed methods research design in which qualitative data carry the primary evidential weight while quantitative data serve a supplementary role, and the entire inquiry is governed by a transformative theoretical framework — one committed to social justice, equity, and the amplification of marginalized voices. The design produces rich contextual understanding alongside statistical corroboration to advance emancipatory or advocacy-oriented goals. | Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|