方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 定性主导的转型性混合方法设计× | 参与式混合方法元推断× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究设计 | 研究设计 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2003–2010 | 1998–2010 |
| 提出者≠ | Donna M. Mertens (transformative framework); John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (weighting typology) | Abbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie (meta-inference concept); extended to participatory contexts by Sweetman, Badiee & Creswell |
| 类型≠ | Mixed methods research design | Integrative inference procedure within participatory mixed methods |
| 开创性文献≠ | Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative Research and Evaluation. Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1593856267 | Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972666 |
| 别名 | QUAL-dominant transformative MMR, qualitative-priority transformative design, QUAL+ transformative mixed methods, transformative mixed methods with qualitative priority | PMMMI, participatory meta-inference, community-based mixed methods inference, integrated meta-inference in participatory research |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 1 |
| 摘要≠ | Qualitative-dominant transformative mixed methods is a mixed methods research design in which qualitative data carry the primary evidential weight while quantitative data serve a supplementary role, and the entire inquiry is governed by a transformative theoretical framework — one committed to social justice, equity, and the amplification of marginalized voices. The design produces rich contextual understanding alongside statistical corroboration to advance emancipatory or advocacy-oriented goals. | Participatory mixed methods meta-inference is the process by which researchers and community co-investigators draw a unified, integrated conclusion — the meta-inference — from separately analysed qualitative and quantitative strands within a participatory mixed methods study. Grounded in the meta-inference framework of Tashakkori and Teddlie and extended into participatory and transformative research contexts, it treats the final synthesis of evidence not merely as a methodological step but as a collaborative, community-accountable act of knowledge production. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|