方法对比

	定性主导的实用主义混合方法	转型混合方法设计
领域	研究设计	研究设计
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	1990s–2010s	2003–2009
提出者	David L. Morgan; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark	Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
类型	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
开创性文献	Morgan, D. L. (2014). Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach. Sage. ISBN: 978-1452204949	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
别名	QUAL-dominant pragmatic MMR, qualitative-priority pragmatic mixed methods, qual-dominant pragmatic design, QUAL+quan pragmatic	transformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods
相关	6	6
摘要	Qualitative-dominant pragmatic mixed methods is a research design in which a qualitative strand carries the primary weight of the inquiry, while a smaller quantitative component adds breadth or corroboration. Grounded in pragmatism as its philosophical framework, the design treats questions of data type, sequence, and integration as practical choices driven by the research problem rather than by methodological ideology.	Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities.