方法对比

	定性主导的实用主义混合方法	实用主义混合方法设计
领域	研究设计	研究设计
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	1990s–2010s	Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century
提出者	David L. Morgan; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark	John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty
类型	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
开创性文献	Morgan, D. L. (2014). Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach. Sage. ISBN: 978-1452204949	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379
别名	QUAL-dominant pragmatic MMR, qualitative-priority pragmatic mixed methods, qual-dominant pragmatic design, QUAL+quan pragmatic	pragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods
相关	6	6
摘要	Qualitative-dominant pragmatic mixed methods is a research design in which a qualitative strand carries the primary weight of the inquiry, while a smaller quantitative component adds breadth or corroboration. Grounded in pragmatism as its philosophical framework, the design treats questions of data type, sequence, and integration as practical choices driven by the research problem rather than by methodological ideology.	Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work.